Competing with Free Music and Movie Downloads: The Digital Rights Management Myth

The media is abuzz with reports of illegal musichave also been attempted, but countermeasures
and movie downloading, peer-to-peer file sharingare created almost as fast. The inescapable
and the related legal and legislative battles beingconclusion is that, short of a complete
played out in courts and in Congress. Many ofgovernment-enforced lock-down of the Internet,
these discussions perpetuate a myth that existing,entertainment businesses will increasingly have to
or soon-to-be developed, digital rightsface the challenge of competing with free.
management (DRM) technologies are the key toAnother challenge for DRM is its negative value
solving the entertainment industry's piracy woes.proposition for consumers. In the real world, a
As support for this notion, many people citesignificant number of microwave oven clocks blink
Apple's successful iTunes music download service.12:00 for years on end because consumers are
The conventional wisdom is that since iTunes useseither unable to learn how to set their clocks, or
DRM and iTunes is successful, then DRM mustthey are just unwilling to bother. Yet some in the
have been instrumental in that success. The truthentertainment industry continue to flirt with the
is that Apple's DRM technology, called FairPlay,idea that consumers will not only tolerate, but also
was indeed instrumental in Apple's success, butpay for, complex DRM-based solutions that are
not because FairPlay prevents piracy.terrible for preventing piracy, but pretty good at
For preventing piracy, FairPlay is not only totallyinconveniencing the very consumers upon whom
ineffective, it was built that way on purpose. Thecommercial success depends. This notion that
iTunes client software enables consumers to burnDRM can protect rights holders and help them to
the songs that they purchase to audio CDs. Oncecompete with free is perpetuated by the
on CD, songs are unencrypted, unprotected andpurveyors of multiple incompatible DRM solutions.
completely beyond the control of FairPlay. YouThese vendors find an eager audience with some
can copy the song to a file share; make a millionexecutives who are so desperate to insulate their
duplicate CDs; or re-encode the song in anotherbusiness models from change that they are willing
format by using legitimate tools like Windowsto believe that DRM snake oil is the answer.
Media Player. So, since the notion that FairPlayIn order to create a service that consumers
prevents piracy is simply not factual, why didwould use, Apple had to provide burning capability
Apple bother to include it in iTunes?in the initial implementation of iTunes. One cannot
There are two very logical reasons for Apple tobe certain, however, that such a feature will
use FairPlay. One has nothing to do with thealways be available. At some future point, Apple
effectiveness of its anti-piracy features andcould decide that it is in Apple's best interest to
everything to do with marketing. That is, having aremove the CD burning feature. If that happens,
DRM-based copy protection illusion made it muchthe only way for customers to get
easier for Apple to convince record labels toFairplay-encrypted music out of iTunes will be to
distribute their music through iTunes. Anothercircumvent Apple's DRM, which is illegal due to the
reason for FairPlay's existence has nothing to doDMCA anti-circumvention provision and similar laws
with protecting rights holders from piracy andin other jurisdictions. It is also important to note
everything to do with protecting Apple fromthat burning capability is notably absent for iTunes
competition. Apple's iPod player and iTunes servicevideo downloads. With the growth in popularity of
were designed to work together. FairPlay is usedApple's iPod, there has been a corresponding
to keep out interlopers. Any would-be iTunes orgrowth in Apple's market power. You can expect
iPod clone maker would almost certainly have toApple to do everything possible to increase that
reverse engineer FairPlay, which makes the taskpower and erect barriers to competition. With
of creating a decent clone much more difficult andlaws like the DMCA on the books, a critical barrier
gives Apple both technical and legal counterattackto competition has the full backing of the
options. Apple showed its cards whengovernment's taxpayer-funded law enforcement
RealNetworks announced Harmony, a technologyresources.
it developed to enable iPod users to buy songsApple's iTunes has demonstrated that you can
from Real's on-line music store. Apple respondedindeed compete with free. But as this document
by threatening that future software upgrades willhas shown, the actual effectiveness of Apple's
probably break Harmony's compatibility. Apple alsoDRM in thwarting piracy played no part in that
suggested that Real's actions may have been asuccess. It is important to note, however, that
violation of the law because the Digital MillenniumiTunes could not be successful solely by using
Copyright Act (DMCA) makes circumventing copyproprietary encryption to lock out competitors
protection illegal. While the validity of Apple's legaland by promoting its DRM to rights holders as an
argument is far from certain, one thing is clear:elixir to piracy. The other half of the iTunes
Apple intends to use its DRM to protect its ownformula for success is completely dependent on
commercial interests, which have absolutelypeoples' behavior: if consumers did not recognize
nothing to do with protecting rights holders fromvalue in iTunes, they would simply not use it.
piracy.Moreover, virtually every song legitimately
Hackers have found technical ways aroundpurchased through iTunes can be acquired for
FairPlay. Digital content pirates, however, do notfree via illegal means. Apple's iTunes service, in
have to crack FairPlay; they can simply takecombination with the iPod player, offers
advantage of a gaping, built-in hole. But even if weconsumers a complete and integrated solution
disregard all past experience with copy protectionthat is easy to use, flexible (e.g. you can burn
and assume that FairPlay could be madesongs to CD) and stylish. iTunes is attractive to
foolproof, it would still provide little or noconsumers, not because FairPlay DRM is
protection from piracy to rights holders. Copies ofrestrictive, but in large part because it is not.
digital content are exact copies. They do notVendors and pundits are doing a profound
degrade no matter how many times you duplicatedisservice to the entertainment industry by
them. Consequently, even just one unprotectedperpetuating the DRM myth and holding up iTunes
copy of a digital work can be perfectly duplicatedas an example. With iTunes, Apple has
millions and millions of times while being distributeddemonstrated the value of DRM for neither
by using file sharing technologies. Since many ofconsumers nor rights holders. Apple has shown,
the latest file sharing technologies, which includehowever, that you can successfully compete with
the wildly-popular Bittorrent, are freely available infree, and get consumers to open their wallets, if
source code form to anyone, the tactic ofyou offer them something better. The
litigating against proprietary P2P software andentertainment industry should take heed from the
service companies is becoming much lessreal iTunes example: create something that
effective. The entertainment industry has startedprovides convenience and value, not costly
going after the operators of Bittorrent servers,complexity, and and you just might take away
but as soon as one is taken down, more springthe incentive to acquire works illegally. That would
up. Technical measures for thwarting file-sharingmake digital piracy obsolete.