Do Contemporary Universities Suffer From A Type Of Cancer

Biologists and medical practitioners have proventhe majority of the academic institutions are
through extensive scientific research and testingprivate, a university is considered as another type
that every living organism renews its cells as itof legal entity with similar economic interests as
gradually matures. If we accept Proust'sthat of a corporation in any industry. Universities,
metaphor that "a nation is a huge organizedalthough non-profit institutions, have not only to
accumulation of individuals," then when culturalsurvive, but also to prosper, as they compete in
norms change so does the nation as a wholea fierce environment using as their
entity. Based on this assumption, a nation, aunique-selling-point the mere knowledge they
country, or generally any type of society, can beteach. As a matter of fact, Universities today
characterized by its critics as "sick" if itshave seized to be agents of free knowledge and
constituent cells change their previous status withtruth, altering their nature to that of a corporation.
unknown consequences. Under this realm, theThis is an undisputable fact, which is the route
crisis contemporary universities have beenunder this whole crisis. Additionally, as the individual
experiencing must be the outcome of thecells of this living organism have realized the
detected changes in people's values, norms,impact and the degree of the 21st century's
priorities and ideology. Thus, as the individual cellseconomic changes, they have began to invest to
change their role, critics have denoted a new typethis new role of the contemporary university,
of "sickness" in the academic environment, a newseeing it as the adequate preparation field for
type of "cancer," which according to scholars likehighly trained consumers and managers.
Miller and Miyoshi, has to be treated adequatelyReturning to the original question, whether
before it completely destroys the institutions'contemporary universities suffer from "cancer" or
primary educational purpose.not, in my opinion the answer is yes. This
Like a human organism is constructed by smallerrealization is not as provocative as it sounds.
portions of matter, the contemporary universityUniversities have realized their power to foster
is an accumulation of students, professors,change, not necessarily with a rebellion nature, the
administrators and many more stakeholders, likeacademic institutions of the West are about to
corporations. These groups share the grounds ofstep forward and propose a new type of
an institution and strive to accomplish variouseducational mode.
goals. In the past, although different views existedThis new role of the contemporary university
and dissensus was present, the unity of themay not be revolutionary, as neither were the
overall institution was not jeopardized.interdisciplinary studies at the time that they were
Unfortunately today, due to the socioeconomicoriginally introduced, but it will be radical and
changes fostered by the capitalistic hegemony,forceful in nature and scale as its primary focus
contradictory interests have divided the variouswill be the critical judgment of its own role and its
university groups threatening unity under theprinciples will be based on the fundamental value
broad academic umbrella. But is there somethingof respect and the notion of accepting and
wrong with corporate intervention and why has itrequiring diversity. Not because it better sells the
managed to create a crisis of this magnitude? Donew character promoted by the institution, but
universities suffer from "cancer"?because through different academic backgrounds
Especially in counties, like the United States, whereand views, true innovation can be generated.