Playwrights Give Critic Bad Review

Members of The Dramatists Guild of America, thethat the workshop process "provides an
organization of playwrights, of which I have beenopportunity for writers to evaluate their work as
an active member for many years, was in anit evolves, protected from the consequences of
unusually feisty mood in a review they let howl atcritical appraisal."
a theater critic in the Windy City. What was theFrom our viewpoint her transgression is not so
occasion of the lambasting?much an occasion for vitriol but for lament, not
A long-time critic for The Chicago Sun-Timesfor her lack of propriety but of wisdom.
reviewed some musicals that were works inIf you look back at the very few critics we've
progress at Theater Building Chicago, a venuehad who one might generously apply the word
that has been attempting to nourish the strugglinggreat in describing, they have known we are all
art form for many years. The critic, one Hedytending the same garden, and, while it's fine to
Weiss, had deigned to review its showcaseharvest in its time, it only helps create a famine
performances in previous years but apparentlyto decide on the quality of the sprouts before
her opinions were not so flagrantly intolerant forthey have time to mature. Whacking them
the head of the theater to ask her to absentprecipitously means, not only less nourishment for
herself until one or more of the works mightall, but less produce worthy of the connoisseur's
mature enough to be presented in a morepersnickety palate.
critic-friendly manner. Not so this year.Ms. Weiss allowed herself a written response,
The unsuspecting critic wrote: "The eight deeplystating that she had reviewed the festival in the
flawed new musicals seemed to suggest the artpast without objection and no one had told her
form has fallen on very hard times." She went onshe could not review it this time. She also called
to maintain that none of the wannabe hits,attention to her understanding that the festival is
"whether in semi-staged or concert-reading style,a public event, with an advertising campaign and
was ready for prime time." Worse yet, she hadtickets. "If you are given a press kit and if you
the ill-advised temerity to admit that she had notare given pictures," she asked a reporter of The
sat through any of the shows because of theirNew York Times, Campbell Robertson, via
poor quality.telephone, "what are you supposed to do with
Enter the howling dramatists.them?"
Edward Albee: "Irresponsible."Meanwhile, Joan Mazzonelli, the executive director
Stephen Schwartz: "Ignorant."of Theater Building Chicago, finds herself in the
Tony Kuchner: "Incapable of understandinguncomfortable middle of the squall. She is, after all,
standards of professional and ethical conduct."condemned to continue in Chicago and has, of
And, as I noted in the Guild's latest newsletter,necessity, distanced herself from her defenders.
Stephen Sondheim weighed in with "Art isn't easy.She has also admitted she hadn't made the
It becomes close to impossible when the creativefestival's policy clear to Ms. Weiss: "Call it an error
process is violated as casually and unprofessionallyof omission is the best I can tell you." She added
as it was in this case, eight times, by Ms. Weiss."the sad refrain, "What's in my hands is that Hedy
John Weidman, the usually affable president of theWeiss, who is a major reviewer, is upset with
guild, fired off a letter to The Sun-Times,me."
accompanied by 22 emails from irate members.But probably not as upset as the librettists,
His missive called her review "a shocking andlyricists, and composers at whose budding works
irresponsible betrayal of one of the fundamentalshe did most unwisely swing her sharp and heavy
understandings which makes the creation of newscythe.
work possible." He also called attention to the fact