What Makes a Movie Musical Successful?

Have you ever wondered why one movie musicalthe female lead in either film. However, the
receives critical acclaim and maybe even anproducers of the movie version of "My Fair Lady"
Academy Award and another movie based on anhad the good sense to hire Audrey Hepburn who
equally good Broadway musical ends up on awas perfectly cast as Eliza Doolittle. She had the
studio shelf, rarely seen after its initial release?innocence and fragility needed for the role with
There are several key factors that lead to ajust enough fire in her to finally rebel against
quality movie musical. These factors include aHenry Higgins, while still leaving the audience
strong story line and well-written screenplay,sympathetic to her. On the other hand, the
quality music, great casting, and effectivefemale lead in "Camelot," Vanessa Redgrave,
direction. Great choreography is often a plus but aalthough an extremely gifted actress, was
movie musical, unlike a Broadway musical, can bemiscast as Guenevere. She presents the
a quality movie without elaborate dances. In thischaracter as a cold, selfish woman who is
article, I compare two movie musicals based onindifferent to the tragedy she brings to her
successful Lerner and Loewe Broadway musicalshusband and his empire. Unfortunately, she was
-- "My Fair Lady" and "Camelot" -- and I discusspermitted to do her own singing with the result of
why "My Fair Lady" was an acclaimed,a lessening of the impact of some of the songs in
award-winning movie that is still viewed and loved"Camelot." On the other hand, Audrey Hepburn's
by millions of people and why "Camelot" hassinging was dubbed by Marni Nixon, a singer with a
become a mostly forgotten film.beautiful, trained voice.
Both plays were successes on Broadway,The casting of the third lead character in each film
although "My Fair Lady" did receive more praisesalso differed in quality. In "My Fair Lady," Colonel
than "Camelot" and it ran for a significantly longerPickering was played by a distinguished English
time. Nevertheless, "Camelot" had a healthy initialactor, Wilfrid Hyde-White, whose acting was
Broadway run and both plays have had threeexcellent. Unfortunately, the key role of Lancelot
short-run revivals on Broadway. Also, both playsin "Camelot" was played by a novice Italian actor,
earned Tony awards for their male leads andFranco Nero, with limited command of English.
Tony nominations for Julie Andrews, the leadingAlthough he certainly fit the role physically, with
female star in both plays. Yet, the movies basedhis exceptional good looks, his acting was stiff and
on the plays had vastly different outcomes, withhis delivery of lines was almost robotic.
"My Fair Lady" garnering eight Academy Awards,The male leads in both films were perfect. In fact,
including Best Picture and Best Actor, and Camelotthe casting of Richard Harris probably saved
earning only three minor awards. So, where did"Camelot" from being a disaster. He was so
"Camelot," the movie, go wrong?well-cast as King Arthur that after the film, he
Plot and Screenplaybecame associated with the role and played it in
Both plays and movies were based on goodseveral major productions, including one on
works of literature -- "My Fair Lady" on the playBroadway and one in London.
"Pygmalion" by George Bernard Shaw, andDirection
"Camelot" on the book "The Once and FutureBoth movies had well-known and well-respected
King" by T. H. White. The screenplays were bothdirectors, but their approaches to directing the
authored by an experienced and award-winningfilms were vastly different. George Cukor, the
author, Alan Jay Lerner, who also wrote the lyricsdirector of "My Fair Lady," let the story and music
for the songs in both works. Therefore, the storygive the movie its strength and character. There
lines and screenplays do not seem to be wherewere no special effects used and no unique filming
the differences lie. In fact, the plot of "Camelot,"techniques, but, rather, just good direction of
with its historic setting, romantic entanglementsexcellent actors and actresses performing on
and scenes of chivalry and war, made it a betterstudio lots. Cukor used the strong screenplay and
vehicle for film than "My Fair Lady" with itsbeautiful music of "My Fair Lady" to guide his
dialog-filled, actionless scenes.direction.
Quality MusicOn the other hand, Joshua Logan, the director of
The scores from "My Fair Lady" and "Camelot,""Camelot," used far too many close-ups that had
both written by Frederick Loewe and Alan Jaythe audience focused on the leads' make-up
Lerner, are wonderful, with a good blend ofrather than on the strong plot and music. In some
beautiful melodies and sometimes poignant andscenes, instead of presenting a natural context
other times humorous lyrics. Both shows had onefor appreciating the songs or dialog, Logan chose
major hit romantic ballad -- "On the Street Whereto fill the large screen with the actors' faces,
You Live" for "My Fair Lady" and "If Ever I Wouldresulting in a distracting rather than enhancing
Leave You" for "Camelot" -- and both songs wereeffect.
dubbed in the movies by professional singers. TheConclusion
songs for the male lead are more melodious inAlthough both "My Fair Lady" and "Camelot" had
"Camelot" and, at least in the movie version, thethe potential to be great films, "Camelot" lacked
male lead, Richard Harris, had a better singingtwo of the four factors necessary for a quality
voice than Rex Harrison had in "My Fair Lady."movie musical. These factors, strong story line
With basically equivalent scores, it seems that it isand well-written screenplay, quality music, great
not the music that distinguishes the two works.casting, and effective direction, could be used to
Castingcompare other movie musicals, for example, "Gigi"
Although Richard Harris was the perfect Kingand "Brigadoon" or "Oklahoma" and "South Pacific,"
Arthur, casting is one major area where theand the results would be similar. A movie musical
movie version of "Camelot" fell short of itsthat is deficient in even one of the four factors
potential. Both plays starred Julie Andrews and hercould make the difference between a film that
beautiful voice added much to the already greatlives on for generations or one that gets lost on a
scores, but, unfortunately, she was not cast asshelf.