Rajiv Jain, Indian Bollywood Cinematographer - Profile Interview Series Vol. #4

Rajiv Jain, Indian Bollywood Cinematographer -daylight stock as well. It just keeps getting better.
Profile Interview Series Vol. #4 
 AH: How about release prints? Do you have a
Rajiv Jain Cinematographer Extraordinaire byfavourite?
Aason HyteRJ: It depends. Kodak has more than one choice
 of stock to print for release. For example, one is
Army, Badhaai Ho Badhaai, Carry on Pandu,softer, one shows more detail, and so forth. You
Kadachit, Kalpvriksh – The Wish Tree, Mirabaihave to choose your stock in accordance with
Not out and Pyar Mein Kabhi Kabhi. But the partialthe picture you are releasing. There isn’t one
reason for these films’ successes is the talentbest one. It’s one that shows off your
that goes on behind the scene, and notedproduct the best.
cinematographer Rajiv Jain is the genius behind 
the camera of these motion pictures (amongAH: Do you have a personal preference in which
many others).aspect ratio to shoot in for each project?
 RJ: It doesn’t matter too much in which
Rajiv, a graduate of Bhartendu Academy ofaspect the director decides to shoot in. It’s a
Dramatic Arts (Bhartendu Natya Academy), firstdifferent composition; you compose differently in
had his hand in Photo Studio work in Lucknow,one format against the other. Close-ups are easier
where he worked as a camera operator forin the spherical 1.85:1 format, and in any of the
Short films, which began his path into his work aswidescreen formats you have to do it a little
a director of photography. Now, his vastdifferently. They both work and they both have
experience has made him one of thetheir own challenges. If you’re showing a large
cornerstones of film photography in Indian cinema.horizontal view and you want the widescreen to
His constant output of hard work and his deepshow the territory, then that’s a good choice.
knowledge of old and new technology has madeIf it’s a little, tight, personal film, then maybe
him one of the most respected cinematographersnot.
out there. In 2010, Today, Rajiv Jain is still 
working on new projects, and is sought out byAH: Where do you stand on the Super 35
filmmakers, both major and independent, for hiswidescreen format? (Super 35 is a spherical
watchful eye.widescreen process where the film’s negative
 is shot in the 1.85:1 “Flat” format and then
I had the opportunity to talk to Mr. Rajiv aboutoptically converted to an anamorphic release print.
his career (and also talk shop, so be forewarnedRJ: Super 35 is a great format. It’s one of
that there’s a bit of tech-talk in here as well)the best choices that you can make today, and
while attending a film forum dedicated to his workthe reason its better now is because of digital
at this year’s Kalasha Film Festival, Kenya.intermediate printing.
  
Aason Hyte: So I’m just going to let this tapeAH: Exactly, which was actually my next question,
roll and feel free to just say what’s on yourhow digital intermediates have changed film
mind-processing in the labs today.
Rajiv Jain: I’m not good at making stuff up,RJ: It changes in this manner; If you’re
so…  shooting in widescreen, Super 35, because all of
 the projectors and houses that are distributing
AH: I am interested in Cinematography, and whenfilm have to squeeze the image in order to use
I found you were coming to the Kalasha Filmtheir lens -- which is a little stupid but it’s a
Festival I thought it would be a great idea to talkmoney thing – you then have to go through
about your career and your immense body ofone step further away in film in Super 35 to get it
work. I’ve been very curious as to how youback to a squeezed image. You no longer have to
got your start in this industry, your education, anddo that with a digital intermediate.
so forth; basically how you wound up as who you 
are today.AH: What’s great too is recently that digital
RJ: It would be easy to tell you about my dramaintermediates have recently gone up to 4k
school background since, simply, I did not go toresolution as opposed to 2k resolution, which
any film school. The way that I learned to gogreatly enhances print quality. “Kalpvriksh –
directly to the movies and see what somebodyThe Wish Tree” and “Carry on Pandu”
else was doing on screen, and then going out andare examples of films shot in Super 35 and
trying to do it myself. And that was it. I alsoDI’ed to 4k resolution and they look
bought the manual that the ASC (Americanabsolutely breathtaking on screen.
Society of Cinematographers) puts out, which isRJ: Oh yeah. You’re doubling your image
known as the bible of filmmaking. I read thequality, digitally, but they still have to back off the
manual and referred to it when I ever had afilm quality a little bit…
shooting problem and thought that I needed help 
on.AH: But I still want it to look like film. You’re
 going to a theatre to see FILM, not digital. A lot of
AH: When you first started watching movies,the films shot in HD look a bit disappointing to me
besides going to see a great story, were you[when transferred to film…]
noticing things like framing, lighting, widescreenRJ: Digital both in sound and in picture has a
formats…harsher quality, and in fact sometimes the detail
RJ: Not at all. At first, I wasn’t interestedlacks the softness that you get from a lens,
technically. I just went to the movies like anyoneespecially a lens that’s out of focus in the
else. But I was impressed by them. I was aboutbackground and sharp focus in the foreground,
five years old when I saw the first sound moviewhich tends to bring that image forward and
ever made and I was impressed by that. But at afocus your attention on it better. In situations like
very subconscious level, I suspect, even though Ithat, sometimes the digital doesn’t feel quite
used to ride along in a cycle and hear my fatheras right, it isn’t quite as natural; and by natural
sing, it was just an experience that was buried inin the terms of a wood in a tree or the feel of
my psyche somewhere. I didn’t startsomeone’s hand. That kind of human
shooting motion pictures until I was about 28experience, you’re kind of further away in
years old.digital sometimes than you are in film.
  
 AH: And you’re still hard at work. What are
AH: What was the first actual job that you had inyou working on right now?
this industry?RJ: I just finished a picture in Kenya with Her
RJ: A guy by the name of Mukul S Anand…Brow entitled lets go and we’re editing that
 right now. It’s being put together as we
AH: Oh, I’m a fan.speak.
RJ: Absolutely. I decided to shoot some 
commercials under him.AH: Who would you say are some of your
 favourite cinematographers? Do you have any
AH: What would you consider the most difficultmajor influences to your work?
aspect of your job as a cinematographer?RJ: Subroto Mitra is one of the greats –
RJ: The harder films are usually the big ones that 
require controlling a lot of people and a lot ofAH: Oh, absolutely. His work on Pather Panchali,
cameras, and over a large area or sometimesmy favourite film, is unforgettable.
many locations. Keeping that organized isRJ: But as for Subroto Mitra, he’s one of the
something that some cinematographers are notmany great cinematographers out there, although
capable of, so they do smaller films. Smaller filmsI don’t want to put one above the other, and
can be just as difficult for them, because thethe reason I don’t is because as great as
pressure of a small film means that they may notSubroto Mitra was, he was different from the
have the time to properly gather their footage,other cinematographers out there.
and that’s another definite pressureSubroto Mitra likes to come up with new formats
that’s equally challenging.and new ways of developing film and he’s
 done a lot of that over the years. A lot of other
AH: Would you say have a personal style to yourpeople have tried it, but again, it depends on who
work, or does it depends on the director for eachyou are and what you think is great. If it’s
project?worth the effort, if you see the difference, then
RJ: I think everybody cannot help but have theirgreat. A lot of times, when you try to take
own style and it comes from the personality; itsomeone else’s technique and reproduce it,
comes from what they feel is beautiful, it comesyou’re not after the same vision and you fail.
from what they think a good composition is; howFrankly, I’m very inventive about the things
they see the world cannot help but invade whatthat I do, and I would rather pursue ideas of my
they do.own simply because I know what I’m after
 rather than copying someone else.
AH: How do you feel that the advance of 
technology has affected your job? By that IAH: What would you say is your favourite
mean newer film stocks, the advance ofphotographed film of all time? Or even your
high-definition, the digital revolution….favourite movie?
RJ: All of the things that you mentioned definitelyRJ: I’d rather not have to make a choice
affect my job, and affect what I do and how Ibecause when you say favourite, it’s almost
do it. It’s a challenge for me to keep uplike voting for the best actor of the year which I
information-wise to know what these things allthink is totally ridiculous because one is as talented
mean. If you’re talking about digitalas the other. You may like it better because of
photography, the challenge is to know how to getthe script or the director directing the actor, but it
the best quality and which system is best to use.is really unfair to say “this one is better than
Some of these systems use compression, therethe other” because it would be equally
are several kinds of compressions; it is importantnonsense for me from all of the great movies
to understand what that is and what it means.that have been made out there and go “I like
For example, the new Red cameras do not usethat one better than ANY other one!”
compression at all, but records onto a hard disk 
and adds the corrections later. They claim by thatAH: I like that answer. I always ask this out of all
to get better quality, and so on; the point is thatof my interviews and I really admire the different,
it is important to understand all of these things, tobroad answers that I get. I either get a brilliant
make a decision on your own part if you’reresponse like that or I get somebody who says
shooting digital, which system you want to use.“I see hundreds of films a year and THIS one
Panasonic has a system where they use curvesis my #1 of all time”. And while I choose
to correct what their camera does so it looksPather Panchali as mine, it’s just an answer to
more like film and that is quite impressive.a question; really, it’s the one that I choose
 even though I have about 100 favourite films of
AH: Where do you stand on high-definition versusall time.  
35mm film?RJ: Absolutely. At any given moment if I’m
RJ: It isn’t a matter of just having an opinion,sitting in a theatre and I’m inspired I would
but your opinion must be based on fact. And thefeel that way at a time, but to sit down and think
fact is that film is probably about twice the qualityabout it, it’s apples and oranges. Different
that the best high-definition has. Film still is themovies are great for different reasons!
best. Part of the reason is the latitude that you 
get on film far exceeds anything that you can getAuthor’s Bio: Dr. Aason Hyte is a professor in
on high-definition video yet, at this point in time.the Department of Sociology and the Human
Someday it may get better, but at the moment,Rights Centre at the University of Essex in the
film far out-reaches the quality of the amount ofUnited Kingdom. He worked with UNIFEM in the
information that can be captured in one little area.conceptualization of its Biennial Review, Progress
Film still stands as the leader, and the new stockof the World's Men and was the coordinator of
that Kodak is putting out has an extra stop ofUNIEM's Progress of the World's Men 2000. He is
latitude towards to both top and bottom. It’sthe principal author of Progress of the World's
absolutely beautiful.Men 2002: Volume 2: Gender Equality and the
 Millennium Development Goals. Dr. Aason also
AH: What’s your favourite kind of stock thatcurrently serves as an adviser to UNIFEM on
you’ve worked with? I know we’regender responsive budgets. He is the author of
getting REALLY technical right now, but I love it.many papers and presentations on gender and
 development, and co-editor (with Careen Grown
RJ: I stand with Kodak film and their new stockand Neuter Caraway) of two special issues of
that has the extra latitude, you can get it in bothWorld Development.
their 500 ASA film and you can get it in their