| First off, let’s start by examining the | | | | something real. All good drama schools and acting |
| meaning of internal, external, stimulation, and | | | | classes know this. |
| simulation. It may seem obvious enough, but | | | | By internal, we may think of the inside as |
| these four concepts are central in evaluating good | | | | opposed to the outside of a book. The outside is |
| acting from mediocre acting or worse, much | | | | the cover, right? Usually it is an illustrative surface |
| worse... Though it may also seem obvious that | | | | that covers the content. Take that analogy a little |
| good acting, like great beauty, has to come from | | | | further and you get an act that |
| inside to make the external shine, | | | | ‘covers’ for something that |
| we’ve all seen bad acting enough to | | | | may or may not be there. |
| know that not all acting training is on the same | | | | Great acting is about tapping into internal |
| page. | | | | resources, which we all have, and using it to the |
| Basically, internal means from the inside. External | | | | fullest. Acting from inside leads to believable |
| means from the outside. Stimulation means an act | | | | characters simply because the emotions are real. |
| that encourages a given response. Simulation | | | | That shows – how could it not? |
| means an act that imitates the appearance of a | | | | Humans are very good at spotting emotional truth |
| given response. | | | | – they can be fooled, but only when |
| Now, let’s look at these concepts | | | | they allow themselves to be. |
| more closely to see how they apply to acting and | | | | The most moving performances, the ones that |
| acting methods. | | | | really touch you, involve actors who bring |
| The external is all about surfaces. | | | | themselves – their emotions, their |
| That’s not necessarily a bad thing | | | | experiences, their physicality – to the |
| – the external is a given and a | | | | role. |
| necessity for the actor. An actor showing up for | | | | Method acting stimulates the process by insisting |
| a casting call, for example, automatically brings | | | | on truthfulness from every angle. |
| their external, visible selves. Strangers on the | | | | Simulation in acting is a sham, a pretense, a |
| street are seen externally for the most part. | | | | shortcut that will only lead to mediocre |
| It’ll take some kind of stimulation | | | | performances at best. Stimulation, on the other |
| – an accident, a tantrum, a fight | | | | hand, comes with hard work and years of great |
| – to make the internal come out. | | | | acting lessons to perfect. The approach of |
| Method acting aims for stimulating the internal to | | | | method acting classes turns out to be one of the |
| come out also. | | | | most, if not the most, successful approaches for |
| With external acting, what you get is voice | | | | insisting on internally-driven acting brought to the |
| inflections, mannerisms, sad/happy faces, | | | | outside. (Marlon Brandon, Harvey Keitel, Denzel |
| presence if the actor is charismatic enough, and | | | | Washington, Ellyn Burstyn, Al Pacino, Sean Penn |
| other tools of projection. Don’t get me | | | | – the list goes on and on – |
| wrong – all these things are important | | | | were trained in The Method.) |
| for an actor. But not at the expense of the | | | | When it comes to solid method acting classes in |
| internal, the emotional truth from within. The | | | | London, I am renowned for providing top level |
| external craft is there to support the internal | | | | instruction. By stimulating your inner tools, not |
| characterization. They are not intended to cover | | | | simulating them. |
| up for - ‘simulate’ - | | | | |