A Critique of Howard Gardner's Text - Frames of Mind

If one watched the NBA Finals in 1998, even ifInterestingly, Gardner's Logical-Mathematical
not a Chicago Bulls fan, one would have to beIntelligence employs practically the same
amazed to witness the graceful maneuvers ofdescription.
Michael Jordan in the air above the basketball rim.Morgan (1983) indicates cognitive theorists have
In the same context, to hear the brilliant vocalidentified three basic sensory modes of interacting
performance of Luciano Pavarotti may move onewith the environment. They are kinesthetic, visual,
to ask if, in fact, it does require a special andand auditory (verbal thinking). It is with "verbal
distinct intelligence to master such demandingthinking" we draw a close comparison to
demonstrations of human brilliance. Or what ofGardner's Linguistic Intelligence - "sensitivity to
the complex interpersonal skills needed by ameanings of words...(and) sensitivity to different
therapist to successfully establish rapport andfunctions of language (p. 266).
assist individuals to make helpful and lastingIn criticism of Gardner's Musical Intelligence,
change? For years, especially in the educationMorgan (1983) argues the auditory component of
circles, most believed such talents were thecognitive learning styles appears to be very similar
periphery of true intelligence.to pitch, timbre, and expressiveness in Gardner's
Howard Gardner, a Harvard University professordescription of Musical Intelligence. Also, how does
and author of Frames of Mind , believes eachone measure one's appreciation of the forms of
performance mentioned above requires a uniquemusical expression? Cognitive theorists have also
and distinct intelligence. When Jordan evadesbeen somewhat skeptical of Musical Intelligence
defensive players while skillfully controlling the ball,based on *End States* due to the fact the
and leaps just at the right moment to both drawvarious sensory modes often mature at various
a foul on the opponent and score a goal,stages in a child's life, so how can we predict
demonstrates what Gardner termsMusical Intelligence based on these *End States?*
bodily-kinesthetic intelligence. When PavarottiAlso, we must not neglect the importance of a
thunderously exhorts a musical score from anchild being raised in a competitive home where
Italian Opera, he draws upon musical intelligence. Amusic is encouraged. A child, for example, with
therapist likewise taps into interpersonal intelligencemoderate ability to perform early in life, with
to fulfill the requirements of that profession.encouragement, motivation, and interest, could
There are four other distinct intelligences of whichexcel in music later in life.
Gardner argues to be unique and separate:Gardner's definition of Spatial Intelligence includes
logical-mathematical, linguistic, spatial, and interthe capacity to perceive the visual-spatial world
intrapersonal. Logical-mathematical intelligence isaccurately and to perform transformations on
sensitivity to, and capacity to discern, logical orone's initial perceptions (Gardner, 1983). Concerning
numerical patterns; ability to handle long chains ofthe cognitive style, Breadth of Categorization,
reasoning. This intelligence would be demanded ofKogan (1976, p. 60) describes it as the ability to
a mathematician or scientist. Conversely, a poetset boundaries, either narrow or broad, around a
or journalist would require high linguistic intelligence:central focal exemplar. According to Morgan,
sensitivity to the sounds, rhythms, and meaningsSpatial Intelligence as described by Gardner is
of words; sensitivity to the different functions ofhighly compatible with the cognitive style
language. Spatial intelligence requires the capacityconstruct of Breadth and Categorization (p.267).
to perceive the visual-spatial world accurately andIndividuals with broad categorizing cognitive styles
to perform transformations on one's initialhave a greater capacity to perceive the
perceptions. Explorers such as Christophervisual-spatial world and match Gardner's concept
Columbus would have required high spatialof Spatial Intelligence. Holtzman & Klein,
intelligence to navigate uncharted waters. Finally, a(1954); Santosteno, (1964); Israel, (1969) referred
unique and separate intelligence termed interto these attributes as leveling and sharpening.
intrapersonal enables one to have knowledge ofWithin the visual/figural (spatial thinking) mode of
one's own strengths, weaknesses, desires, andleveling and sharpening, one discovers a striking
intelligences - a blessing to any therapist who maysimilarity to Gardner's "capacity to perceive the
have clients with such distinct intelligence.visual-spatial world...and to perform
In researching multiple intelligence, I came acrosstransformations on one's initial perceptions"
dozens of articles, book chapters, and similar text(Morgan, 1983. p 267).
associated with Gardner's concepts of multipleThere is a striking similarity within Gardner's
intelligence (MI). The basic concepts of MI theoryBodily-Kinesthetic category (abilities to control
is confined within Frames of Mind (1983).one's body movements and handle objects
According to many researchers such as H.skillfully) with the work of cognitive style
Morgan, Professor of Early Childhood at Westinvestigations related to sensory modalities and
Georgia College, the theory that multiple factorsmotor control. Kinesthetic (motoric thinking), is one
contribute to what is generally consideredof three cognitive style basic modalities found
intelligence is not new (Morgan, 1996). As early aswithin the framework of Gardner's Linguistic
the 18th century Christian Wolff wrote of aIntelligence. Motoric thinking as described in
facultas appetiva and a facultas cognoseitiva - acognitive style theory is essential to body
faculty for willing and a faculty for knowing.movement and control (Morgan, 1983, p. 267).
Later, German philosophers added a third facultyOther criticisms of Gardner's Bodily-Kinesthetic
for feeling. In 1939, Louis Thurstone of thetheory is delineating between non-competitive
University of Chicago had published evidence forperformance and athletic performance on the
seven independent mental abilities - verbalplaying field. According to Elias, (1979); Einstein,
comprehension, word fluency, numerical fluency,(1979); Fiske, (1977) allude to a sensory-active
spatial visualization, associative memory, speed ofcognitive style that tends to guide the information
perception and reason (Miller, 1983). C.P. Snow'sprocessing for certain individuals, such as Black
observation that intellectual life had becomeand Hispanic students. In other words, the
organized into two mutually uncomprehendinginformation processing for the athlete on the
groups, with literary intellectuals at one pole andplaying field could be drastically different from that
physical scientists at the other, likewise caused awithin a non-competitive situation. These
stir in 1959. Some intellectuals saw this asresearchers discovered Black and Hispanic
evidence of our failing educational system (Miller,students tend to perform better in classrooms
1983). Gardner responded to this limited scope ofthat are not silent.
intellectual range by stating, "I think it has to doThe final Intelligence identified by Gardner is
with the circumstances under which theInterpersonal and intrapersonal Intelligence. Briefly,
intelligence test was developed. It was developedGardner's has identified the absence or presence
to predict who would have trouble in school. Soof external (interpersonal), and internal
it's basically a scholastic kind of measure, and the(intrapersonal) social skills as
more you try to apply intelligence tests results to*intelligences.*Cognitive style theorists have
milieus like schools - which can include certain kindsdefined these characteristics with the domains of
of professional or business organizations-the moreField Independent and/or Field Dependent
appropriate the IQ test is, and the morecharacteristics employed by individuals during social
appropriate that standard definition is. But, onceencounters (Morgan, 1996). Another contrast with
you move to outside of school-like settings, thenGardner's theory on inter/intra intelligences can be
the standard theory of intelligence is much lessfound in the work of Bieri (1961) who identified
appropriate" (Koch, 1996).the bimodal cognitive style labeled Cognitive
According to Miller, other lists of mental facultiesComplexity vs. Cognitive Simplicity - the
were compiled by the school of "common senseconstructs by which individuals define their
philosophy" in Scotland and later used in thepersonal and social world. These constructs
science of phrenology in the German schoolcompare with Gardner's *capacities to discern and
headed by Franz Gall, who identified 35 facultiesrespond appropriately to the moods,
localized to different parts of the head. Howevertemperments, and desires of other people"
in the middle of the 19th century, the whole(Morgan, 1996, p. 268).
conception of separate faculties was displaced byWith regard to the arguments supporting
theories of association of ideas, and even incognitive learning styles as opposed to Multiple
America, efforts by Horace Mann to keep theIntelligence, the debate will inevitably continue.
school of phrenological alive faded by the close ofMany researchers, educators, and practitioners
the 19th century (1983).have much invested in support of the MI theory.
History appears to repeat itself, and according toDespite the semantical difference in terms
Miller, the theory of MI, in its myriad forms, is nointelligence or cognitive learning styles, the
exception. In Frames of Mind, Gardner mentionsoverarching benefit of Gardner's work was to
the fact Chromsky calls these faculties organs;silence the proponents of the single factor
the philosopher Gerald Fedor calls them modules;constructs of intelligence. In summary, Miller (1983)
the British psychologist Allport calls themstates, "The value of Frames of Mind lies less in
production systems. Howard Gardner calls themthe answers it proposes that in the problems it
intelligences (1983).The paramount question is,poses. They are important problems, and time
"Are they multiple intelligences or are theyspent thinking about them will be time well spent,
cognitive styles?" L.L. Thurstone was among thewhether or not your conclusions agree with Mr.
first of the intelligence test makers to suggestGardner's."
that the human organism was too complex forReferences:
intellectual activity to be determined solely by aBieri, J. (1961) Complexity - Simplicity as a
single human factor (Morgan, 1996). As a resultpersonality variable in cognitive performance
Thurstone (1938) developed the Primary Mentalbehavior.
Abilities test, a multivariate analyses as a methodFunctions of Varied Experience. Homewood, Illinois:
of measuring intellectual functioning. Thurnstone'sDorsey Press
theory suggested, much to the liking of Gardner,Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind. New York:
that intelligence could not be determined byBasic Books
measuring a single ability. The practice ofGardner, H. & Hatch. (1989). Multiple
intelligence testing began to follow the pattern ofIntelligences go to school: Educational implications
Thurstone. The work of Gardner has continued inof the theory of Mulitple Intelligences.
similar fashion except perhaps for, semantics.Educational Researcher 18, (8), 4-10
In analyzing Gardner's seven distinct intelligencesHoltzman, P.S. & Klein, G.S. (1954). Cognitive
beginning with logical-mathematical intelligence, onesystem principles of leveling and sharpening
discovers an interesting parallel to two otherindividual differences in assimilation effects in visual
cognitive styles. In the 1940s, Briggs and Meyerstime error. Journal of Psychology 37, 105-122
started developing self-report questions thatKogan, N. (1976). Cognitive Styles In Infancy and
would lead to assessments of individual personalityEarly Childhood. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
types and their cognitive styles. They expandedMiller, G. (1983). Varieties of Intelligence. New York
cognitive style theory to include typologicalTimes Review . Dec 25, 5 & 20
constructs from their personality theory. ThisMorgan, H. (1996). An Analysis of Gardner's
concept has been referred to as the Myers-BriggsTheory of Multiple Intelligence. Roeper-Review. Vol
Type Indicator (MBTI) (Myers and McCauley,18,4, pp. 263-269
1985). As mentioned earlier, Gardner categorizedMyers. I. B. and McCauley, M.H. (1985). Manual: A
logical-mathematical intelligence as the capacity toGuide to the Development and Use of the
discern logical or numerical patterns and handleMyers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, California:
long chains of reasoning (Gardner & Hatch,Consulting Psychologist Press
1989). The MBTI also identified theseKoch, C. (1996). The Bright Stuff. CIO magazine.
characteristics as cognitive learning stylesMar. 15
employed by various personality types (Morgan,Santostefano, S. G. (1964). A developmental
1996, p. 266). Another learning style, The Fieldstudy of the cognitive control leveling-sharpening.
Independent types, approach object relations in anMerrill- Palmer Quarterly 10. 343-360
analytical manner with the ability to discernThurston, L.L. (1938). Primary Mental Abilities.
objects as discrete from their context.